<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: 8 Days, we hardly knew ye</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2005/08/26/8_days_we_hardl.php</link>
<description>All comments for 8 Days, we hardly knew ye</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Mathew Levinson</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2005/08/26/8_days_we_hardl.php#comment-203892</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2005/08/26/8_days_we_hardl.php#comment-203892</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:26:19 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, having seen SH mag hit the streets this week, it looks like a change for the better.  The content and layout are far better, the cringe-worthy columns are gone, they&apos;ve even gone so far as to irreverently comment on it in the editorial.  Good on them I say. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mathew Levinson</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2005/08/26/8_days_we_hardl.php#comment-203880</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2005/08/26/8_days_we_hardl.php#comment-203880</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:28:10 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s hard to see the reasoning behind the magazine (and website) keeping so quiet on the changes.  Is that just their business style?  I guess the other columnists are staying then?  I quite like Adam&apos;s pieces. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>