http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php All comments for Shanghai soccer star to shine in Europe? en-us 2009 shang_kenneth Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kenneth@shanghaiist.com kenneth@shanghaiist.com 60 http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203923 http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203923 Comments Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:00:03 +0800 <p>Ok I have been tempted out of silence... Mike: I feel like I do after a good Shanghai Saturday night - used and abused :-p Micah: Shanghaiist laid this egg... after all, it does say in the report that I was there. It was just good-old fashioned journalism - getting your arse along and seeing for yourself instead of arsing about on the net... But thanks for your interest guys. Check out this link to my blog for a more personal account of the match in question.</p> http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203921 http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203921 Comments Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:22:30 +0800 <p>The chicken, or the egg? Maybe the above author sourced the Economist?</p> http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203918 http://shanghaiist.com/2005/09/01/shanghai_soccer.php#comment-203918 Comments Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:15:09 +0800 <p>There's been some discussion on danwei.org recently about China newspapers "copy and paste method of content creation." I think Shanghaiist might be interested to know that its not just the China newspapers that are at it, but The Economist too. In The Economist's recent Shanghai briefing (available here: http://www.economist.com/cities/briefing.cfm?city_id=SHA&fsrc=nwl), the writer basically copied the above posting word-for-word. I wonder how the writer of the above posting feels about it: used or flattered?</p>