<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: King Kong!</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/01/18/king_kong.php</link>
<description>All comments for King Kong!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Steven</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/01/18/king_kong.php#comment-204586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/01/18/king_kong.php#comment-204586</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:12:01 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm... I found a link (in Chinese) to the transcript of a press conference. The remarks were made by the authors of the so-called cultural industry blue paper, which was the source of the 260 number cited in the Shanghai Daily article.

http://china.dayoo.com/gb/content/2006-01/11/content_2373069.htm

The authors were apparently referring to the total output of movies made in China -- 260 expected in 2006, 212 for last year, etc. It seems the Shanghai Daily story just got it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
