<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: China Mobile worth more than Google?</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/04/07/china_mobile_wo.php</link>
<description>All comments for China Mobile worth more than Google?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Derek Scruggs</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/04/07/china_mobile_wo.php#comment-205182</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/04/07/china_mobile_wo.php#comment-205182</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:16:01 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;These things are so bogus and totally unaccountable. After all, how do you prove that the appraiser is wrong? At least alleged stock market gurus have real benchmarks to measure against.

What &quot;value&quot; would Apple&apos;s brand have if Microsoft bought it?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
