<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Extra! Extra! Asexual marriage, insecure billionaires, Bruce Lee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/07/24/extra_extra_ins.php</link>
<description>All comments for Extra! Extra! Asexual marriage, insecure billionaires, Bruce Lee</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>alisha</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/07/24/extra_extra_ins.php#comment-278990</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/07/24/extra_extra_ins.php#comment-278990</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:25:18 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I just saw an article from Reuters about the asexual marriage website that was dated 24 July 2006, the same as the article here. Are you all using the same news sources? Or is there something else going on here? This is not the first time that I&apos;ve seen a Reuters news story about something in Shanghai show up at or around the same time that Shanghaiist has posted about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>awrq</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/07/24/extra_extra_ins.php#comment-278511</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/07/24/extra_extra_ins.php#comment-278511</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:52:17 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;

Oversee Chinese girls are hotties in China.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
