<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Single-Parent Adoption vs Gay Adoption</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php</link>
<description>All comments for Single-Parent Adoption vs Gay Adoption</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Andy</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437850</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437850</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:24:48 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The classification thing. When I read about it a report said that homosexuality was still a mental disorder. It was originally classified here as mental disorder: perversion and it was downgraded to mental disorder: personality problem. 

It just confirms what you see in every country. Allegedly intelligent/educated people in high places, such as doctors, lawyers, professors etc, are just as bonkers as the next person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kenneth T</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437739</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437739</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:19:13 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;That is true in a way, hurhur...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>hdp</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437715</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-437715</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:02:55 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Where there&apos;s a will there&apos;s a way, and where there&apos;s a pink dollar there&apos;s a way too ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kenneth T</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435782</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435782</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 23:38:54 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Nope, if both parents are Chinese citizens, it will be considered a domestic adoption.

If one or both parents are foreign, and if the adopted child is to taken on a foreign passport, then he or she will have to give up Chinese citizenship because China does not allow dual citizenship as far as I understand.

If you&apos;re American, then you will have to take the citizenship oath on behalf of the child at the consulate-general in Guangzhou before the child leaves China, if I&apos;m not wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>YZ</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435556</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435556</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:58:55 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Is it still considered an international adoption if the people wishing to adopt are Chinese citizens living abroad? 5% seems like a very restrictive limit considering how many Americans are interested in adopting girls from Asia. In fact, I see a lot of them around Washington DC. The girls usually seem rather happy and spoiled. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Nick</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435206</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/11/singleparent_ad.php#comment-435206</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:19:09 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The typically Chinese thing about the adoptions is that there is ONE company which HAS TO handle all adoptions for it to be legal. They are called something like &apos;China Women&apos;s Federation&apos;. I guess they are owned by Hu Jintao&apos;s niece of somesuch other bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
