<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: 140 Mistresses ... and other Shanghai scandal news</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/24/140_mistresses.php</link>
<description>All comments for 140 Mistresses ... and other Shanghai scandal news</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Simon Templar</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/24/140_mistresses.php#comment-511748</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2006/10/24/140_mistresses.php#comment-511748</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:18:50 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;mistresses...they fuel the chinese economy.. plaza 66 boutiques on nanjing lu would be empty without them.

they even built mandarine city apartments in gubei to house them all. 

notice how mistresses are not banned, you just have to register them. my view is this is just so the &quot;da laoban&quot; can check that his mistress is not skimming it off the top with another customer/boyfriend.   &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
