<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: 239 gets 86ed</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/01/25/239_gets_86ed.php</link>
<description>All comments for 239 gets 86ed</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Down With 239</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/01/25/239_gets_86ed.php#comment-994504</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/01/25/239_gets_86ed.php#comment-994504</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:29:42 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;i can&apos;t say i&apos;m really disappointed or saddened to hear such news. i was a firm fan of the food at 239 up until my friends and i (a party of 8) had a dinner at the place. we were slapped with a 600RMB WATER bill that evening. i&apos;m not sure if such service protocol is standard in Shanghai, but the staff neglected to inform/ask each time they opened a new bottle of water - i haven&apos;t any idea whether they were instructed by restaurant management to serve customers in such a manner. but 600RMB for 8 bottles of water is ridiculous - even Jean-Georges dares not. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>