<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Shanghai still doesn&apos;t have enough people</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/02/04/shanghai_still.php</link>
<description>All comments for Shanghai still doesn&apos;t have enough people</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>nanheyangrouchuan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/02/04/shanghai_still.php#comment-1003027</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/02/04/shanghai_still.php#comment-1003027</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:30:13 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It is ironic and good that the cities who snub these &quot;tu ren&quot; will have to basically sell themselves to wandering bands of these same people.  That includes extending labor law enforcement and educational access to them.

But what may happen first is that Beijing may declare its rights as &quot;the throne&quot; of China to simply take away migrants to work for the glory of the city/country while SH, Suzhou, Shenzhen, Hanghzhou and Guangdong get alloted &quot;rations&quot; of migrants.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>