<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Shanghai ranked 100th for quality of living</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php</link>
<description>All comments for Shanghai ranked 100th for quality of living</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>top50-sanitation</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058854</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058854</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:23:09 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Mercer Human Resource Consulting Worldwide Health and Sanitation Ranking* 
2007 
 
Top 50 
 
    Base City: New York, USA (=100)     
              
Rank 
2007   City   Country   Index 2007 
              
1   CALGARY   Canada   131.7 
2   HONOLULU, HI   United States   130.3 
3   HELSINKI   Finland   128.5 
4   OTTAWA   Canada   127.2 
5   MINNEAPOLIS, MN   United States   125.7 
6   OSLO   Norway   125 
6   STOCKHOLM   Sweden   125 
6   ZURICH   Switzerland   125 
9   KATSUYAMA   Japan   123.8 
10   BERN   Switzerland   123.7 
10   BOSTON, MA   United States   123.7 
10   GENEVA   Switzerland   123.7 
10   LEXINGTON, KY   United States   123.7 
10   MONTREAL   Canada   123.7 
10   NURNBERG   Germany   123.7 
10   PITTSBURGH, PA   United States   123.7 
10   VANCOUVER   Canada   123.7 
18   AUCKLAND   New Zealand   123.1 
18   WELLINGTON   New Zealand   123.1 
20   DUBLIN   Ireland   122.9 
21   AMSTERDAM   The Netherlands   122.4 
21   TORONTO   Canada   122.4 
23   LYON   France   122.3 
24   COPENHAGEN   Denmark   122.2 
25   KOBE   Japan   122 
25   OMUTA   Japan   122 
27   WASHINGTON, DC   United States   121 
28   DUSSELDORF   Germany   120.9 
28   FRANKFURT   Germany   120.9 
28   LUXEMBOURG   Luxembourg   120.9 
28   MUNICH   Germany   120.9 
28   VIENNA   Austria   120.9 
33   TSUKUBA   Japan   120.4 
34   PORTLAND, OR   United States   119.7 
35   ADELAIDE   Australia   119.5 
36   BRUSSELS   Belgium   118.4 
37   CLEVELAND, OH   United States   118.3 
37   HAMBURG   Germany   118.3 
37   SAN FRANCISCO, CA   United States   118.3 
37   ST. LOUIS, MO   United States   118.3 
37   WINSTON SALEM, NC   United States   118.3 
42   YOKOHAMA   Japan   118.1 
43   MELBOURNE   Australia   117.4 
43   PERTH   Australia   117.4 
45   BERLIN   Germany   117.1 
46   YOKKAICHI   Japan   116.5 
47   BRISBANE   Australia   116.2 
48   GLASGOW   United Kingdom   115.7 
49   SEATTLE, WA   United States   115.1 
50   SINGAPORE   Singapore   114 
 
 
* Hospital Services; Medical Supplies; Infectious Diseases; Water Potability; 
Troublesome and destructive animals/insects; Waste Removal; Sewage and Air 
Pollution&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>top50</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058852</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058852</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:22:29 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Mercer Human Resource Consulting Worldwide Quality of Living Survey 2007 
 
Top 50 
 
Base City: New York, USA (=100) 
  
Rank 
2007   Rank 2006   City   Country   Index 2007   Index 2006 
                      
1   1   ZURICH   Switzerland   108.1   108.2 
2   2   GENEVA   Switzerland   108.0   108.1 
3   3   VANCOUVER   Canada   107.7   107.7 
3   4   VIENNA   Austria   107.7   107.5 
5   5   AUCKLAND   New Zealand   107.3   107.3 
5   6   DUSSELDORF   Germany   107.3   107.2 
7   7   FRANKFURT   Germany   107.1   107.0 
8   8   MUNICH   Germany   106.9   106.8 
9   9   BERN   Switzerland   106.5   106.5 
9   9   SYDNEY   Australia   106.5   106.5 
11   11   COPENHAGEN   Denmark   106.2   106.2 
12   12   WELLINGTON   New Zealand   105.8   105.8 
13   13   AMSTERDAM   The Netherlands   105.7   105.7 
14   14   BRUSSELS   Belgium   105.6   105.6 
15   15   TORONTO   Canada   105.4   105.4 
16   16   BERLIN   Germany   105.2   105.1 
17   17   MELBOURNE   Australia   105.0   105.0 
18   18   LUXEMBOURG   Luxembourg   104.8   104.8 
18   18   OTTAWA   Canada   104.8   104.8 
20   20   STOCKHOLM   Sweden   104.7   104.7 
21   21   PERTH   Australia   104.5   104.5 
22   22   MONTREAL   Canada   104.3   104.3 
23   23   NURNBERG   Germany   104.2   104.1 
24   25   CALGARY   Canada   103.6   103.6 
24   26   HAMBURG   Germany   103.6   103.4 
26   31   OSLO   Norway   103.5   102.8 
27   24   DUBLIN   Ireland   103.3   103.8 
27   27   HONOLULU, HI   United States   103.3   103.3 
29   28   SAN FRANCISCO, CA   United States   103.2   103.2 
30   29   ADELAIDE   Australia   103.1   103.1 
30   29   HELSINKI   Finland   103.1   103.1 
32   31   BRISBANE   Australia   102.8   102.8 
33   33   PARIS   France   102.7   102.7 
34   34   SINGAPORE   Singapore   102.5   102.5 
35   35   TOKYO   Japan   102.3   102.3 
36   37   LYON   France   101.9   101.6 
36   36   BOSTON, MA   United States   101.9   101.9 
38   37   YOKOHAMA   Japan   101.7   101.6 
39   39   LONDON   United Kingdom   101.2   101.2 
40   40   KOBE   Japan   101.0   101.0 
41   44   BARCELONA   Spain   100.6   100.2 
42   45   MADRID   Spain   100.5   100.1 
42   51   OSAKA   Japan   100.5   99.6 
44   41   WASHINGTON, DC   United States   100.4   100.4 
44   41   CHICAGO, IL   United States   100.4   100.4 
46   43   PORTLAND, OR   United States   100.3   100.3 
47   53   LISBON   Portugal   100.1   98.9 
48   46   NEW YORK CITY, NY   United States   100.0   100.0 
49   51   MILAN   Italy   99.9   99.6 
49   47   SEATTLE, WA   United States   99.9   99.9&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dirty</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058849</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/03/shanghai_ranked.php#comment-1058849</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:18:20 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Asia-Pacific health and sanitation rankings

Auckland and Wellington in New Zealand rank in joint 18th place, with a rating of 123.1. All the Australian cities covered by the survey rank higher than New York, the base city.  Adelaide is the highest-scoring city in Australia at position 35 (score 119.5) while Sydney is the lowest in 62nd place (score 111.3).


Japan is home to the five highest-rated cities in Asia.  Katsuyama leads in 9th position with a score of 123.8, followed by Kobe and Omuta in joint 25th place (score 122). Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka come in joint 53rd place and score 113.5.

  

Elsewhere in this region, Singapore ranks in 50th place with a score of 114, while Hong Kong is at position 117 and scores 80.8.  Shanghai and Beijing are China’s highest and lowest-ranking cities in 134th and 166th place respectively (scoring 73.8 and 60.3). Modernisation of medical infrastructure has improved living standards in these Chinese cities. However, air pollution and inadequate waste removal and sewage systems are still a concern – particularly in Beijing.  
 

Indian cities score relatively poorly for health and sanitation, with scores ranging from 52.8 for Chennai (position 177) to 38.2 for Mumbai (position 209). Most Indian cities are densely populated with poor waste removal and sewage systems. These issues, combined with increasing air pollution, contribute to their relatively low ratings.

 

“Expatriates on assignment in some locations - for example Africa, the Middle East and some parts of Asia, Europe and Latin America - can face harsher living conditions and lower standards of medical care and facilities than they are accustomed to,” commented Mr Parakatil. “The threat of infectious diseases and environmental risks are very real in some cities and should be taken into account. Migration and mobility can exacerbate the transmission of diseases, and this should be a top concern for employers managing international assignments.”&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>