<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Google apologizes to Sohu: &apos;Oops, didn&apos;t mean to steal your code&apos;</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php</link>
<description>All comments for Google apologizes to Sohu: &apos;Oops, didn&apos;t mean to steal your code&apos;</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Tim B</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063844</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063844</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:50:27 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought all coding was just copy and paste? Right?

;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Sheniferous</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063369</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063369</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:34:35 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe they just Googled around for it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jay</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063363</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063363</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:08:36 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for pointing that out, I stand corrected. 

But that doesn&apos;t change the nature of what google did: they lifted someone else&apos;s proprietary work w/o due credit, and in this case a competitor&apos;s work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>John</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063359</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/09/google_apologiz.php#comment-1063359</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:59:18 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You are wrong about the &quot;Non Google generated source code&quot;.

In fact, what google has said is &quot;Non Google Generated data source&quot;.  It is &quot;data source&quot; not the general &quot;source code&quot;.  Do you understand?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>