<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Architects propose Shanghai building shaped like 人</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php</link>
<description>All comments for Architects propose Shanghai building shaped like 人</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>your right</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1067238</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1067238</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:26:53 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;you&apos;re right, most of the crap on this blog isn&apos;t worth reading, and i didn&apos;t read your &apos;article&apos; either.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>payattention</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1066721</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1066721</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:34:12 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Formula: if you even bothered to read the article (not to mention the preceding posters&apos; comments) you would know that the building was not designed by Chinese architects, but by a group in Copenhagen. Please be aware of what you are commenting on before trying to criticize next time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>the formula</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1066485</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1066485</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:59:47 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Do Chinese architects think that all they have to do is produce cookie-cutter modern architecture, add-in a dash of &quot;China&quot; and someohow it becomes interesting?!?!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>staff</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065797</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065797</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:07:21 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This proposal seems pretty dead anyway. I&apos;ve been following it for quite a while as I&apos;m from the Copenhagen area and have known about BIG (Bjarke Ingels Group) for a long time.

I&apos;d be surprised if this projects gets a go-ahead. Although, you never know in Shanghai.

Be sure to check out forum.skyscraperpage.com as well. Great forum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>James Creegan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065732</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065732</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:07:33 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah it looks like you just walk up the side and jump into wherever you&apos;re going. Incredible anyway, hope I&apos;m still in town to see it&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Skim</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065701</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065701</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:07:27 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I like photo #5, where the people are just walking up the side of the building.  Bring Danny Way back and let him skateboard down the side of it!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Brett</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065678</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065678</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:17:30 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;This blows my mind.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fons Tuinstra</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065674</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/04/12/architects_prop.php#comment-1065674</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:10:09 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There is already a building like that and actually a pretty prestigious: the new Party School in Pudong. I have been there and talked to the architects a few years ago. Pretty amazing building.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>