The Great Wall among the New Seven Wonders

It is now official: The Great Wall has been chosen as one of the new Seven Wonders of the World in an unprecedented global vote that drew nearly 100 million internet and telephone voters. In fact it received the most votes among the 21 finalist sites (not very surprising as China has one of the biggest internet populations?). Other sites that have been recognised as new wonders include:

  1. Petra, Jordan

  2. The statue of Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro

  3. The Incan ruins of Machu Picchu, Peru

  4. The Mayan city of Chichen Itza, Mexico

  5. The Coliseum, Rome

  6. The Taj Mahal, India

The 14 sites that did not make it were:

  1. The Acropolis, Greece

  2. Alhambra, Spain

  3. Angkor, Cambodia

  4. Statues of Easter Island, Chile

  5. Eiffel Tower, France

  6. Hagia Sophia, Turkey

  7. Kiyomizu Temple, Japan

  8. Kremlin/St. Basil, Russia

  9. Neuschwanstein Castle, Germany

  10. Pyramids of Giza, Egypt

  11. Statue of Liberty, USA

  12. Stonehenge, United Kingdom

  13. Sydney Opera House, Australia

  14. Timbuktu, Mali

Only one of the original seven wonders, the Pyramids of Egypt, can still be seen. The others were the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, the Statue of Zeus at Olympia, the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, the Colossus of Rhodes and the Lighthouse of Alexandria. Unfortunately, the Pyramids were not selected among the new Seven Wonders but they have been given honorary status after an Egyptian official complained that it was undignified that the pyramids had to compete in an online poll.

Backers of the competition believe that the selection of the wonders would be better put to a vote rather than by an arbitrary panel of experts. However, there was no foolproof way of preventing people from voting more than once for their favourite wonder. Already, UNESCO has slammed the new seven wonders list. Comments by various UNESCO spokespeople include the following:

This campaign responds to other criteria and objectives than that of UNESCO in the field of heritage. We have a much broader vision.

[The New Seven Wonders sends out a]... negative message to countries whose sites have not been retained. All of these wonders obviously deserve a place on the list, but what disturbs us is that the list is limited to just seven. Seven were adequate in antiquity because the antique world was much smaller than today.

Email This Entry


Comments (4) [rss]

The Pyramids of Egypt are still a part of the 7, and I agree that it is outrageous to not include them permanently. To this day, no one knows how they were built and the level of astronomical and architectural accuracy is scary even by standards 100 years ago much less 5000.

The Egyptians set up a civil service requirement for all Egyptian citizens to take part in building the pyramids for a set time every year, the rest of us, including China, fiddled with stone spears.

nanheyangrouchuan

I thought scientists and historians have a pretty good idea how they built pyramids for awhile now. I've seen documentaries on Discovery channel on it awhile ago.

Although as a Chinese I think Great Wall deserve a spot in the seven wonders, I agree the voting process is unfair since there are probably significant more Chinese voters than any other.

#2:

There are theories ranging from using logs as rollers to using massive sails to move the stones, stone counterweights on trebuchets, etc.

A french architect has a good theory on how the pyramids were designed (from the inside out) but technology to move the blocks is very much a mystery.
Until about 10 years ago, the prevailing theory was massive slave labor instead of organized civil service.

nanheyangrouchuan

Yes, the Pyramid of Giza are a mystery, but so is Stonehenge, which didn't make the list.

To be perfectly honest I think limiting the worlds antiquities to just 7 is a joke. Why must one marvel of human ingenuity be valued as greater then another.

Can't we just list each of them as a Wonder of the World in their own right.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Personals

Enter our FREE personals site!

Tips

About Shanghaiist

Shanghaiist is a website about Shanghai, China.

Editor: Elaine Chow
Founding Editor: Dan Washburn
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archives | Arts/Entertainment | Calendar | Contact | Contribute | Facebook | Favorites | Feedburner | Food/Drink | Jobs | Mobile | News | Other | Personals | Popular | RSS | Staff | Top Users | Twitter | Write For Us


Shanghaiist Direct

Too busy to check the site? Receive a daily email with links to all Shanghaiist posts from the previous 24 hours.

Enter your email


Recent Comments

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Obama and America’s banker Hu-Jintao November 17, 2009 by politicalsnapshots.wordpress.com Obama
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Shanghaiist.

All Our RSS