<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Snippets: Chinese journalism, death sentences and climate change</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/07/10/snippets_chinese_journalism_death_sentences_and_climate_change.php</link>
<description>All comments for Snippets: Chinese journalism, death sentences and climate change</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/07/10/snippets_chinese_journalism_death_sentences_and_climate_change.php#comment-1143397</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/07/10/snippets_chinese_journalism_death_sentences_and_climate_change.php#comment-1143397</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:36:29 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Imagethief seems to be generalising one type of journalism into all, which is rare for him to make such a mistake.

Chinese newspapers wil freely criticse lots of things, for example they will report that people don&apos;t like the Olympic mascots, or something of a similar public standing.

However are they ever allowed to truly comment and debate highly political issues? A simple no.

Western media has it&apos;s crap. But it is undeniably better because it does have a significant section of impartiality, freedom, truth and honesty, despite the various bias.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>