<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Snippets: China and Africa</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/08/14/snippets_china.php</link>
<description>All comments for Snippets: China and Africa</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/08/14/snippets_china.php#comment-1171730</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/08/14/snippets_china.php#comment-1171730</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 04:30:23 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Nine politcal parties?  But they are all subentities of the Communist Party, right?  I don&apos;t think the word &quot;deomcracy&quot; can be redefined this way.  You can have &quot;harmonious,&quot; but &quot;democracy&quot; shouldn&apos;t be distorted to mean its opposite.  I guess voting for SuperGirl or GuyGoo is better than nothing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2007/08/14/snippets_china.php#comment-1171698</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2007/08/14/snippets_china.php#comment-1171698</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 04:10:57 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;China practises a unique democratic experience, which is beneficial, reasonable and fruitful because it suits the country and has stood the test of time.&quot;

And crack is a unique psychological experience.  And how could &quot;Chinese democracy&quot; have stood the test of time if the PRC has only been around for 50 years?  

nanheyangrouchuan&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
