http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php All comments for India's China envy en-us 2009 shang_kenneth Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss kenneth@shanghaiist.com kenneth@shanghaiist.com 60 http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226493 http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226493 Comments Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:43:57 +0800 <p>As I understand it, the report was about papers with citations, not about the number of papers per se. Of course, would anyone expect a 'journalist' to know the difference, I guess not.</p> http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226445 http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226445 Comments Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:19:47 +0800 <p>h$tp://w&w.veoh.com/videos/v1357069DKZqmaty</p> http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226436 http://shanghaiist.com/2007/10/28/indias_china_en.php#comment-1226436 Comments Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:11:04 +0800 <p>Much of China's scientific advancements have also come from reverse engineering mandatory technology transfers when foreign companies come knocking and from pure IP ripoffs, not to mention the PLA's massive espionage program. What India can take pride in is the fact that none of its global companies is wholly or partially owned by New Dehli while all of China's global companies are wholly or partially owned by Beijing.</p>