Quantcast

Facebook to enter China? What next?

facebookchina.jpgSo both Myspace and Friendster have their own China versions. Now Kaiser Kuo of Ogilvy Digital China Watch points us to a report on China Business News (第一财经日报) which cites an “industry insider” who says that Facebook plans to release additional language interfaces and intends to enter the China market as early as December this year. The paper also claims that "Facebook has given up its initial plan to set up its own China-based site like MySpace has done with MySpace.cn, but will instead acquire an existing SNS in China."

But as Fons Tuinstra of China Herald notes, Facebook may avoid the Chinese internet censors by establishing a Chinese-language operation outside China instead of finding a local partner, but it may end up getting blocked almost instantly, like Youtube did (sigh...).

A commenter on Kaiser's blog said:

Whatever they do i hope they seamlessly their link Chinese version to their English version. Click …and swithc language. Those who are perfectly bilingual ( which i am NOT) should be able to communicate with their Chinese friends in Chinese and with their non-chinese friends in english … without changing platforms. Otherwise 2 monoligual silos will be created. That would be - from a mutual understanding point of view- a missed opportunity.

And Rebecca MacKinnon, once again, hits the nail on the head:

Really too bad. If they do end up having to create different Facebook "silos" in order to be compliant with Chinese government censorship requirements (and maybe other governments with other language services too), it isn't just a missed opportunity to provide a great global, multilingual service that many people would find incredibly exciting.

The silo-ing of social networking sites like Facebook (and MySpace China already) is a sadly missed opportunity to build bridges of communication and understanding between the Chinese-speaking world and the English-speaking world. God knows we desperately need better communication and understanding between native Chinese speakers and native English speakers these days.

Is this inevitable? Isn't this situation also serving to "ghettoize" Chinese internet users instead of giving them a multilingual on-ramp to a global human network? If I was a Chinese internet user I'd feel like my government is holding me back by controlling the web in China so much that Facebook can't open its doors for me to a global multilingual and multicultural network - a network that would be best not only for my social life but also for my career and business.

Earlier this week, we were treated to a very interesting tidbit of information by Thomas Crampton, and we suspect MacKinnon may have had this in mind when she wrote the above. According to Crampton, the Chinese internet rarely links to foreign websites. In fact, only six percent of the Chinese Internet’s hyperlinks leave China’s webspace! This information was based on a study of 40 million external links on 5 million pages of 15,000 sites in China by Professor Jonathan Zhu of City University of Hong Kong (and Tobias Escher has more). The geek in Shanghaiist finds all this very interesting. It is true, isn't it? A significant chunk of this huge global jungle that we call the Internet really is just local activity. But we do wonder if similar research has been done for other countries and language groups on the Internet.

Related links
Ogilvy China Digital Watch: Facebook to enter China: CBN report
China Herald: Is Facebook getting itself blocked?
RConversation: Facebook goes to China... will it censor too?
Thomas Crampton: China’s Internet rarely links to foreign websites
Tobias Escher: The Internet is local and Chinese do not link abroad

Contact the author of this article or email tips@shanghaiist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Michael Darragh

    At least YouTube is back online :-)

  • Stephen Yang

    Reading this article made me think about a conversation I had recently with a native Chinese. As a New Yorker, I was a bit frustrated that I had been denied access to some websites while in China. The general sentiment in the United States is that everyone should have access to websites and that it should be censored locally, i.e. by family or each individual; our online freedom seems to be a logical extension of our other freedoms of speech and print.



    When I asked my Chinese friend if the government censorship bothered her, she replied "no." She said that she had never had a freedom on the internet and so she couldn't lament a denied access to a website. For her, the government isn't censoring anything, because the website never existed in the first place. I'm not all for government control, but we Westerners should be careful not to western-pomorphize the world. Just because someone doesn't have a freedom we have, doesn't necessarily mean that they long for it. Often freedom is a relative term and we choose certain freedoms over others. No one is completely free who lives in a society and culture. Assuming that we are liberating another people by giving them the things we have and expecting them to then think like us can actually be a contradictory position.

  • ThomasCrampton

    FYI: related to this topic I recently did a posting with a co-founder of Friendster explaining rationale behind the social network's refusal to localize for China.



    http://www.thomascrampton.com/2007/10/23/kent-lindstrom-why-friendster-refuses-to-localize-for-china/

blog comments powered by Disqus

personals

Enter our FREE personals site!

send a tip

tips@shanghaiist.com

Contribute

Latest Tip:

Since I think of you as a chiller and a much more productive edition of me, I just printed out this
[more]

Latest Photo: