<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Some great environmental news to start the new year with</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/02/some_great_envi.php</link>
<description>All comments for Some great environmental news to start the new year with</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shanghailaine</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>elaine@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>elaine@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>nanheyangrouchuan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/02/some_great_envi.php#comment-1262658</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/02/some_great_envi.php#comment-1262658</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:17:46 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The only way to economically pull this off and maintain some sort of political and economical integrity would be to move the political bodies, give each resident a large amount of money to pay for their own relocation to a place of their choice and businesses will be on their own.  Anything else would take all 1.3 trillion of those reserves and then some.

And then there is the next question, where to put the capital?  I am imagining that most of China&apos;s cities would actually vehemently oppose this move as  local bosses in the CCP, PSB, PLA and PAP as well as local businessmen would see nearly all of their power evaporate overnight.  And most of China&apos;s cities are in much worse shape from an infrastructure standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
