<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Al-Jazeera on the Maglev uproar</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/21/aljazeera_on_th.php</link>
<description>All comments for Al-Jazeera on the Maglev uproar</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>James Creegan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/21/aljazeera_on_th.php#comment-1274762</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/01/21/aljazeera_on_th.php#comment-1274762</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:22:25 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;The extended line may not harm our health, but we still fear it could cause our residential units&apos; prices to drop,&quot; said a resident living near the proposed route.


Nice. So although there are no real risks, the residents should get a pay out because perceived risks (which they amped up) will bring down property prices.
 
There&apos;s a logic there somewhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>