Shanghaiist: The return of the KMT

nanheyangrouchuan

Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:54:16 +0800

@yunny: Your opinion is yours alone. Go play in traffic, China sucks and the expat cummunity sucks worse for making China stronger.

yunny

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:11:01 +0800

nanhe: your attempts to bash China at every turn only serve to undermine your credibility as readers no longer desire to determine whether you're exaggerating half-truths just to make a point (e.g. Cairo Declaration, China's provocation), or whether you actually have a substantial argument to make (as some of the other comments you've made in earlier articles). Just because the a tiger is fierce and carnivorous doesn't mean it's the provoker when you're tickling its nose.

ddrkk

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:39:32 +0800

You did, If the AEI is (more of a tank than a think tank) and "Neo-conservative" I am guessing you think his opinion is bogus. So why quote it, or are you admitting they have something to say.

jfkmiller

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:14:56 +0800

Who says it's not worthwhile?

ddrkk

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:08:05 +0800

Cute barb at the "Neocons". If there was nothing worth while in that WSJ quote why quote it?

Les Izmore

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:32:30 +0800

There you go again...

nanheyangrouchuan

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:08:25 +0800

Haven't been laid in a while EL JEFE?

EL JEFE

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:35:07 +0800

Work is currently being done on trying to ignore you. How about your coordinates so I can let fly a well-deserved turd?

nanheyangrouchuan

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:05:25 +0800

Work is currently being done on mapping the air defense grids of Shenzhen and Guangzhou, which are also within the crosshairs of freedom loving Taiwanese, Japanese, Koreans and the US. Soon the Vietnamese will be on board with supersonic cruise missiles.

jfkmiller

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:51 +0800

Good to know. I can barely work Guanxi, but these coordinates are invaluable.

nanheyangrouchuan

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:47:36 +0800

Thanks to some freedom loving Chinese and some righteous minded foreigners in China, the Bilderberg armies, the US, Japan, SK and Taiwan have the coordinates of the SA-10 defense grids around Beijing and Shanghai. Now the financial and cultural centers of China can be smashed should China misbehave in Asia: PLA SA-10 SAM SITE East of Beijing 40 06'54.81 North 116 59'20.93 East 98 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE South East of Beijing 39 48'24.03 North 117 02'41.20 East 57 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE South of Beijing 39 34'36.38 North 116 45'38.33 East 59 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE South West of Beijing 39 22'44.91 North 116 07'51.48 East 85 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE West of Dalian - Yingchengzi PLAAF base 39 00'18.46 North 121 24'00.15 East 30 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE North of Shanghai 31 49'23.95 North 121 51'00.70 East 13 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE North of Shanghai 31 29'24.70 North 121 16'42.86 East 11 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE south of Shanghai 30 52'53.32 North 121 52'16.48 East 16 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE southwest of Shanghai 30 50'17.81 North 121 33'41.35 East 10 ft. Elevation PLA SA-10 SAM SITE Gangtou 25 34'34.88 North 119 27'15.44 East 52 ft. Elevation PLAAF SA-10 SAM SITE AT Luocheng 25 01'59.45 North 118 48'26.19 East 54 ft. Elevation

nanheyangrouchuan

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:51:33 +0800

"Chen has provoked Beijing by pushing for greater independence from the Chinese mainland, and has called for a nationwide referendum, to coincide with the presidential election in March, on Taiwan's membership to the UN" Couldn't be that Taiwan is an independent nation per the Cairo Treaty, which China under the CCP also signed and therefore has a right to self determination. And who is doing the provoking when China has 1000 ballistic missiles and around 2000 J-6 and J-7 drones.

shopgirl

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:41:08 +0800

Taiwan has finally understood that fighting for an independent country is not the rational thing to do right now. Taiwan knows that they are extremely dependent on the mainland corncerning not just on investments but also a lot of other factors.

moneyinabox

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:16:46 +0800

“The US is obliged by law to defend Taiwan.” This is false. The Taiwan Relations Act was purposely written in vague legal-speak in order to give the United States flexibility in regards to how to respond to an act of Chinese aggression against the island.

Les Izmore

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:30:32 +0800

There are treaties and laws relating to the 'mutual defense' of Taiwan. For a good overview of the right wing understanding of the relationship between the US and ROC check this web page. http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/asb72.cfm