Quantcast

Barack Obama and the Global Primary

barackobama.jpgShanghaiist is happy to learn that we finally have a chance to break free from the shackles of political impotence and actually make somewhat of a difference in the increasingly heated U.S. presidential campaign. Democrats Abroad, the overseas branch of the U.S. Democratic Party, is holding its first global presidential primary from February 5th through the 12th. For the first time, expatriates who are American citizens have a chance to vote in the Democratic primary without having to mail in an absentee ballot (or for states that have caucuses, travel back home). According to the organization's press release:

“In the past, overseas voting could be both complicated and cumbersome. We’ve been working hard to make the process easier for voters around the world,” says Christine Schon Marques, International Chair of Democrats Abroad.

Just as the primary season back home gets into full swing, Democrats living overseas will be choosing their candidate, too. The Democratic global primary allows for balloting by Internet, fax and post. Traditional drop-in Voting Centers will also be open in more than 30 countries around the globe.

The worldwide election results will determine the 14 delegates who will join eight DNC members in Democrats Abroad’s delegation of 22 to the Democratic National Convention. These delegates will be elected at a combination of regional and global meetings held during early 2008. These meetings also provide an opportunity for Americans abroad to shape the party's election platform.

The Democrats Abroad site has a list of over thirty "country groups" that we're assuming will have the drop-in voting centers, and China is not on the list. If we're right, that means those of us here are going to have to vote online, through snail mail, or by fax. Voters will still have to use absentee ballots to vote in the national election in November. While some voters may still want to cast absentee ballots where their votes may have more of an impact in states with ultra competitive primary races, we're still happy that for the first time, expats are now an official voting bloc.

Supporters of Democratic candidate Barack Obama (this particular Shanghaiist is one of them) are hosting an event at 7pm next Tuesday, January 29th, for interested folks to register in the global primary, and to learn more about who they believe is the most thoughtful and dynamic candidate in the race. The party will be held at the bistro roomtwentyeight, downstairs at the new boutique URBN hotel (#183 Jiaozhou Lu behing Jing'an Temple), with drinks and snacks to be served.

The party will be limited to 100 people, so RSVPs are required and can be made by sending an e-mail to obamashanghai@gmail.com. For those who are interested in registering online before or in place of attending the party, you can do so here. Shanghaiist will be there; come say hi before you register.

Photo by laphoto1.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@shanghaiist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • EL JEFE

    Anyone that has survived having electrodes strapped to their nuts gets my vote.



    Yeah Hillary in 2008!

  • nanheyangrouchuan

    Obama smashed Billary/Hilla-monster 55% to 26%.

  • Here's how I'm cynical about US politics.



    The concept of Democracy is about government by the people, not going partisan over rich people's popularity contests.



    As for pro-war, Chomsky points out frequently that if the precedents set down by the Nuremburg Trials were followed then every US president since WW2 would have been hanged.



    The same goes for my native UK too.

  • Les Izmore

    T- Here are my two main points without all the other confusing words;



    "the pro Wall Street corporatist line that both the Clintons and Obama represent..... From my point of view the cynics among us see this business as usual as some sort of change."



    How you get from this to whatever you are believe I wrote is beyond me. Here is my point in a nutshell.



    Hillary = big business and Wall Street.

    Obama not very much different from Hillary.

    People who think Obama and Hillary = change - cynical



    Hoping for hope is what I think the Obama people are doing. If you care my preferred candidate would be Edwards.

  • T

    so. .. the cynics are the ones being hopeful. . . and those who believe it's business as usual arn't cynical? That pretty much goes the opposite of the definitions, no? I mean, I realize it's all PoMo to be flexible with one's definitions, but this isn't like bad meaning good (cf. Run DMC) - those hoping for a better day and a new brand of politics from Obama are far from cynical about the whole process. Those believing it's "business as usual" are, BY VERY DEFINITION, cynics.



    And honestly, the "being proud" is a throw-away line . .. a joke if you will. I'm not sure why you preceive "cynical" as being "insultingly dismissive" - hell, I watch the Daily Show. I know about being cynical.



    Anywho - Obama '08.

  • zjemi

    Even Slate doesn't point out that Hillary's "experience" as a Senator includes only 2 minor bills--against flag burning (US flags only, others are OK to burn) and sex videos for minors. In contrast, although Barack Obama has had fewer years in the Senate (but more total legislative experience), he has cosponsored and negotiated important legislation on immigration (with McCain), health care for children, curbing lobbyists, limiting campaign finance abuses, helping wounded vets and their families, and lots more. I don't agree with everything he's done, but at least he's done stuff. HRC has put in her time but this experience claim is a joke.



    BTW, all my information about them is from Wikipedia. Check it out, because apparently the media haven't.

  • Les Izmore

    T - Read my last sentence again, slowly. You are having trouble with your reading comprehension. I didn't call myself a cynic. Being proud of being dismissive and insulting is like saying you're proud of being an ass. If the Republicans win this one we really are in for WW III...

  • ddrkk

    Just like 2004 people are acting like the republicans don't exist. That is why the international press was shocked that Bush handily won in 2004.



    The coverage in Europe alone was 4:1 in volume of reporting on Kerry versus Bush.



    Same thing here, this race is wide open and Hillary or Obama both can lose to a Republican. It is far from over.

  • T

    So on one hand, I'm insultingly dismissive, but on the other hand you call yourself a cynic.



    Er, so I was right in calling you cynical?



    Anyways, if you knew me personally, you'd know I deal with EVERYONE in an insultingly dismissive way. It's how I roll.

  • Les Izmore

    Actually T, your insultingly dismissive attitude toward anyone who doesn't accept the pro Wall Street corporatist line that both the Clintons and Obama represent as cynical is why many progressives are dreading another Clinton presidency. I have very good reasons for disliking their pro war, pro business policies. (And yes, I do know that Obama was against the war and Bill was too but never said so and that Hillary never imagined that GWB would actually use the 'authorization of force' to attack Iraq) Both of them want to increase the military to protect the homeland from the shadowy terrorist menace and both would keep a military presence in Iraq for a very long time. Their position is that we should start removing troops soon but very slowly. From my point of view the cynics among us see this business as usual as some sort of change.

  • Eric Hu

    Re: loads more experience than Obama...



    http://www.slate.com/id/2182073/



    Glad you're an Obama guy, though. See you on Tuesday

  • T

    Hilary just doesn't know what she's talking about -





    Actually, everyone (except for the rabid Hillary haters/Repubs) thinks Hillary would make an exceedingly competent president. She's experienced, tough, and has loads more experience than Obama.



    But what she doesn't have is the mantle of leadership that Obama (and her husband, to be frank) had. I would like to feel confident in my President again - Obama makes me feel that way.



    If Billy Bob were able to run again, I'd probably vote for him though - but Obama represents (hopefully) a new era of politics in the US. At least for those of us non-cynics.

  • James Creegan

    I don't know much about US politics, but I do know that if the states had a black president- Americans could really have fun rubbing that in the faces of us European liberals!

  • Alec

    Given the current crop of candidates I am for Obama as well . . . but I'm curious, Sienna, what exactly are you referring to? Hillary actually has a far more substantial record and firmer policies than Barak. My problem is simply that I feel that we need someone with as few links as possible to the entrenched establishment, but isn't a total kook like Kucenich.

  • shopgirl

    As a non-american citizen I would definitely vote or Obama if I had the chance.



    I think America needs a break now from the Republicas, Hilary just doesn't know what she's talking about, she's good at talking crap with no importance in it.

  • nanheyangrouchuan

    Yeah! Obama '08! Boot that tired bag Billary back to bra and draft card burning!

  • Les Izmore

    Harold Stassen for me..

  • T

    I'm a Jimmy Carter man, myself.

  • moneyinabox

    I am voting for Mondale again like I do every four years.

blog comments powered by Disqus

personals

Enter our FREE personals site!

send a tip

tips@shanghaiist.com

recent comments