<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: This is a Golden Award Winner in the China International Photography Arts Expo 2007...</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php</link>
<description>All comments for This is a Golden Award Winner in the China International Photography Arts Expo 2007...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>evo</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295836</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295836</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:36:24 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Nothing fake about those Edison shots.

but seriously, this kind of behaviour with regard to ethics in photojournalism (not to mention other kinds of journalism)  is endemic in this country.  Mainly because there has been no ethical guidance about what a (documentary) photo should entail - both in its capture, its meaning, and its distribution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>suepart</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295136</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295136</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:13:31 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, whatever...who cares...it&apos;s obvious it looks faker than a vouis luitton bag made in china.

where&apos;s the new edison pictures?  he should be photographer of the year 2008.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>James Creegan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295100</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/02/20/this_is_a_golde_1.php#comment-1295100</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:21:43 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s strange- when I read about the antelopes and train in Shanghai Daily I thought it was a terrible manipulation of the truth. But reading the photographers story and how he never submitted it as news, it&apos;s not quite so cut and dried.

The first photo looks awful though. There&apos;s no controversy about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>