Vision Beijing films premiere, and all of them suck

The idea is simple: get five internationally reknowned directors to make short, impressionistic films about Beijing, showing the people of Beijing in their everyday lives and as they prepare for the Olympics—and in the kindest light possible. The five filmmakers were: Patrice Leconte (France), Andrew Lau (Hong Kong/China), Majid Majidi (Iran), Giuseppe Tornatore (Italy), and Daryl Goodrich (UK). You can find a rundown of each film's style and content as well as a link to each one.Whatever their differences in style and subject matter, they are all undeniably and unforgivably cheesy, like postcards of moving images. They remind us of those insipid China Eastern Airlines commercials—except worse—because you have to take into account that these were made by men (not a woman in the bunch) that have, at some point in their lives, made films that were actually fit for human consumption.There's a little voice inside our head that tells us that no one likes the guy that takes things a bit too seriously and can't see the light-hearted side of things—it's the Olympics after all, and Pollyannish is to be expected, Olympic-colored balloons can and should rise and form the Olympic rings in the azure sky. At the same time, there was another little voice in our head that it's also okay for us to slightly downgrade our respect for directors, renowned or not, that strew this kind of filmic excrement over our collective sidewalk. These artists are kinda sucking CCP cock, aren't they? Okay, we know this ain't Cannes, and that it might be considered an honor by some to be allowed to make promotional films for the Olympic Games. But seriously, is banality the new language of ideology? Please, show us more people striking on drums and practicing tai-chi in the park. And throw in some cute little Chinese kids while you're at it. Sorry, < /end_rant_here >. We'll start taking our meds again, we promise.

Cross-posted at the China Film Journal

Email This Entry


Comments (2) [rss]

"Is banality the new language of ideology?" Nicely put question. Echoes that famous Hannah Arendt quote about the banality of evil (not to get too heavy with the implied analogy) and that famous (ummm... famous if you're, like, a comparative literature grad student) Walter Benjamin bit about the politicization of aesthetics and the aestheticization of politics (the latter symptomatic of totalitarianism... the former more like, say, what Bjork pulled, roughly speaking).

Not that I have any brilliant point here, just appreciate the question and how it's phrased and the overall take on the propagandadvertising. Too bad Leni Riefenstahl's not still around to do another kick-ass Olympic film, eh?

I'm not even going to bother watching any of the shorts to see just how right you are. I know better. And the real reason for the possibility of suckiness is that these were made by directors who are not writers. A film with a great script can be made awful by a director, but a film with a awful script can't be made to look good. Maybe the Olympic committee should've hired a few screenwriters to help with the projects. Live and learn.

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Personals

Enter our FREE personals site!

Tips

About Shanghaiist

Shanghaiist is a website about Shanghai, China.

Editor: Elaine Chow
Founding Editor: Dan Washburn
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archives | Arts/Entertainment | Calendar | Contact | Contribute | Facebook | Favorites | Feedburner | Food/Drink | Jobs | Mobile | News | Other | Personals | Popular | RSS | Staff | Top Users | Twitter | Write For Us


Shanghaiist Direct

Too busy to check the site? Receive a daily email with links to all Shanghaiist posts from the previous 24 hours.

Enter your email


Recent Comments

Contribute

Latest Tip:

I thought Plum Rain season was supposed to be over?
[more]

Latest Photo:

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Shanghaiist.

All Our RSS