<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Ching Cheong interview with RFA</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/05/09/ching_cheong_interview_with_rfa.php</link>
<description>All comments for Ching Cheong interview with RFA</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shanghailaine</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>elaine@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>elaine@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>richardlee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/05/09/ching_cheong_interview_with_rfa.php#comment-1359163</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/05/09/ching_cheong_interview_with_rfa.php#comment-1359163</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:19:15 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;   We all know what nature of RFA or VOA is. Anybody that takes news mainly from these two propaganda radio stations of US government is just too naive. And Mr. Ching, by reciveing interview from RFA, proves how unprofessional he is as a &quot;journalist&quot;. He should have chosen a serious and neutral news agency to do the interview.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>