<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Mianyang now a ghost town</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/06/07/mianyang_now_a.php</link>
<description>All comments for Mianyang now a ghost town</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>SauLaan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/06/07/mianyang_now_a.php#comment-1379378</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/06/07/mianyang_now_a.php#comment-1379378</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:52:43 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone here heard anything about adequacy of troop levels in the earthquake and new &quot;lake&quot; zones?

I&apos;m wondering if there&apos;s any sense of PLA currently stationed elsewhere being needed at home for what is obviously at this point a massive problem, to the point that the people are commenting on it in the same way people here in the States have commented on the need for National Guard troops in Iraq to be home assisting with natural disasters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
