<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: Xinhua does it again: Space mission report hits the Internet before launch of Shenzhou 7</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php</link>
<description>All comments for Xinhua does it again: Space mission report hits the Internet before launch of Shenzhou 7</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_kenneth</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:00:13 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kenneth@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>BigNoodle</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1475907</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1475907</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:18:23 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Buck : haha, i love you !

hard to believe, but China is still communist..; er... that&apos;s a Chinese friend who told me that. And maybe this dialog, and this press release were part of the current 5-years plan ?? But press did better that taikonauts : these ones were one day late !

let&apos;s bash them, and not the press, which is free now, since China had Olymics... ^^&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>NannyState</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1475899</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1475899</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:00:38 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;^hahaha!

 Anyone would know that Dow Corning couldn&apos;t make a leaky toilet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eastman</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1474035</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1474035</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:35:11 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To nanheyangrouchuan,
I wonder medicines can still help to an diot like you who, seeing JV Sanlu made a huge profit by adding malamine to milk, start to add milk to melamine instead, while selling melamine.


To NannyState/WatchBagDVD
I remember it was discovered the moon was made by Dow Corning, approved by FDA but leaking like old toilet. Though you never connected the scandal to your government and ask for compensation, I still hope you two can manage to remove them before cremation since it will definitely cost more with that four balls in your chests. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>WatchBagDVD</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473869</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473869</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:12:40 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The astronauts also discovered that the moon is, in fact, made of green malamine-enhanced cheese. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>NannyState</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473850</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473850</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:12:56 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s true: in a recently de-classified document, NASA reveals that astronauts who landed on the Moon discovered evidence that the Moon is indeed a renegade province of China. That&apos;s why moon missions were abruptly ended in the early &apos;70s and why the U.S. hasn&apos;t returned since. (although Jack Nicholaus has offerred his services to the chinese government to design golf courses there)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>nanheyangrouchuan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473826</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473826</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:39:36 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Chances are it will have melamine or lead, or both in it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eastman</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473774</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473774</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:30:02 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To nanheyangrouchuan,

--&quot;The only space China has entered is the space between Chinese peoples&apos; ears&quot;?

Go take some medicine, but not the wrong one as always you did.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>nanheyangrouchuan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473543</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 14:24:50 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Our space accomplishments are evident in the large space station and the probes and telescopes that can see the lunar vehicles we left behind.  

The only space China has entered is the space between Chinese peoples&apos; ears.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eastman</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473505</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473505</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:35:36 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To Buck Rogerz
&quot;change the topic&quot;? Was it the topic of Lhasa riot that made you think of the size of penis, of Daliar Lama?

To WatchBagDVD 
When was the last time BBC faked a story and got fined? But sure the story was not about a faked moon landing.

To nanheyangrouchuan,
Go free-market buy vegetable dont forget busket. 
 &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>richardlee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473496</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473496</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:02:41 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Buck Rogerz:
  Are you a gay? why do you want to know my dick size? oh, no,no,no....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>WatchBagDVD</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473480</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473480</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:01:47 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Has anyone actually seen a Chinese guy spacewalk? Like with their own eyes? Did Zhang Yimou have a hand in this whole production? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>nanheyangrouchuan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473373</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473373</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:45:52 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Just goes to show what a small minded, chemically polluted wreckage of a culture and nation China is.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Buck Rogerz</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473280</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473280</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:49:14 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You silly little men constantly must change the topic to defend you childish sense of national pride. Of course, no proof is necessary for your irrelevant claims and you behave as if bringing up unrelated issues you somehow lends dignity to your nation. What a joke! You are a bunch of stereotypes!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fuzi</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473247</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473247</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:39:53 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Buck Rogerz: you are so very wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eastman</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473228</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473228</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:35:31 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To Buck Rogerz

What time can you finally manage to pull that Daliar used condom out of your big mouth on the nightpot above your redneck? Jiayou! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Buck Rogerz</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473222</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473222</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:30:04 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Once again, richardlee and eastman give us all the impression that Chinese are idiots with small penises and smaller brains.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>eastman</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473221</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473221</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:08:58 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;To taihanasie

--&quot;Xinhua would not mention the crackdowns on the peaceful protests that predated the riots in Lhasa&quot;. 

Yes if BBC would not mention the riot BEFORE  the crackdown. It was only until &quot;Economist&quot; confirmed the riot (since God forbit westerners to listen to Chinese) that BBC admitted reluctantly the happening of riot. That&apos;s the reason why I, unlike you, always seek the whole picture from Xinhua plus CNN (not BBC) divide two.

I am glad west media at last spoke of Lhasa riot as part of truth, no matter whether they called rioters as freedom fighters or lynching mobsters as they used to call Bin Ladin or blacks in LA or whether they treated rioters chasing foreign settlers in S. Africa and German neo-nazi calling &quot;Auslander aus&quot; the same way. Don&apos;t forget Daliar had called the dealy riot a peaceful protest for a full month till he changed his tone. I am also glad, when he told a new crackdown with 140 Tibeten deads, west media thought twice in reporting, since Daliar still owed Beijing a detailed 200 deadlist list he promised. Up to now he only supplied 40, with ALL faked names. Of course BBC will never let foot-soldiers on bandwagen like you know it, as it&apos;s a democratic secret in the hidden geopolitical agenda. lol!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>richardlee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473220</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473220</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:47:14 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;   Just read Southern Weekend before you talk about predicatability issue. have a second thought when you say: Chinese news orgs all follow patterns....blah,blah... Just like you hate to hear &quot;western media is all biased&quot; or&quot; we Chinese...&quot;. Over-generalizatin is everywhere!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>richardlee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473215</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473215</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:06:06 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It is so interesting to see reactions here. I did not defend anything but just told you a fact similar to this one. I have no judgement here. But suddenly some guys become so emotional. I didnot criticize any parties. But if i want to criticize BBC for example, do i have the right to do so? You guys just show how great you are, how tolerant you are! Don&apos;t tell me Chinese are not open to different opinions. just look at yourself! you are no better than Chinese, even by an inch! 
  BTW, that night, unfortunately, CCTV DID report the torch disruption, since it found that it could not ignore this kind of news any more, like they did for the Turkey leg. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>taihanasie</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473163</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473163</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:25:27 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, and dsk, there was no irony. Most big events are scripted. My company writes press releases with quotes of speeches that executives will give before the executives give the speeches. This is because the speeches are written by the company or agreed upon in advance. So we know what the executives will say. This said, you would NEVER release a press release that had all of that info in it before the event happened. After all, what if the executive suddenly flubbs his lines, sending the hall into uproarious laughter?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>taihanasie</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473161</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1473161</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:21:19 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Richardlee, there is a difference:
1) It is well known that Chinese news orgs follow patterns and have certain instructions on what matters they will and will not report. For example, I could have told you before Xinhua reported on the Tibet crisis that Xinhua would not mention the crackdowns on the peaceful protests that predated the riots in Lhasa. 

2) The BBC did not go through the entire run-down of an event point by point as if it had already happened. They anticipated a detail instead of releasing a whole story. This would be less important for other events, but a launch is a risky thing. Imagine if there had been a problem? That would have been a PR nightmare.

The creation of this news story is not a big deal in itself though. Everyone creates news before it happens. Xinhua already had a rundown of how everything would go. Therefore, someone was just trying to save time by writing the story early and filling in the key details later. I have done it before myself. 

The boo boo was that Xinhua accidentally released the story before they were supposed to. For that, they deserve to be laughed at. Next time, if things DON&apos;T go according to plan, the consequences will be much worse. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dsk</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472685</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472685</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:59:45 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The irony is everything xinhua wrote happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Fuzi</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472586</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:38:50 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I remember the BBC snafu during the torch relay. We laughed about that one then, just as I must laugh about this new report. :-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pirx</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472550</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472550</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:19:13 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@richardlee

The censoring of news in China is so boring and predictable, that BBC could put it down in advance and still be 100% right. In terms of journalism, unacceptable, of course.

Probably the Shenhua start was orchestrated in such minute detail including the expected conversations, that Xinhua could post it and be sure it would be accurate. 

Or was someone at Xinhua sabotaging so to expose and ridicule the fabrication and falsification of news in China?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Pirx</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472549</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472549</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:18:59 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;@richardlee

The censoring of news in China is so boring and predictable, that BBC could put it down in advance and still be 100% right. In terms of journalism, unacceptable, of course.

Probably the Shenhua start was orchestrated in such minute detail including the expected conversations, that Xinhua could post it and be sure it would be accurate. 

Or was someone at Xinhua sabotaging so to expose and ridicule the fabrication and falsification of news in China?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Buck Rogerz</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472437</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472437</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:56:20 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Since ancient times, outer space has always been an inseparable part of unified China.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>DontBlameMe</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472411</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472411</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:36:23 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;But I&apos;m sure the rest of the mission will be reported with accuracy!  HA!  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>LoveChinaLongTime</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472306</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472306</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:34:57 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Vigilant China blog patrollers always catch convenient biased, evil Western journalism stories to counter current China media muckup posts to deflect attention!!

Way to go richardlee!!!! &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kenneth Tan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472302</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472302</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:21:10 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm.... that is news to me. Have you got a link for that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>richardlee</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472301</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/09/26/xinhua_does_it_again_space_mission.php#comment-1472301</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:10:36 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;  We should condemn Xinhua&apos;s shoddy journalism. That&apos;s for sure.And i think Chinese will mock Xinhua if they know. But just let you know, BBC did the same thing. During the Olympic torch relay in London, BBC reporter in China reported at 6:30pm that CCTV&apos;s Xinwenlianbo program(news broadcast), which stars 7 pm every night, did not mention the torch relay disruption in London as a result of news cover-up. Half hour before the CCTV news program started!!! genius!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>