<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: What $40 billion gets you these days</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php</link>
<description>All comments for What $40 billion gets you these days</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shanghailaine</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>elaine@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>elaine@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>stoli</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1523450</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1523450</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:50:28 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;sarcasm |ˈsärˌkazəm|
noun
the use of irony to mock or convey contempt : his voice, hardened by sarcasm, could not hide his resentment.

ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: from French sarcasme, or via late Latin from late Greek sarkasmos, from Greek sarkazein ‘tear flesh,’ in late Greek ‘gnash the teeth, speak bitterly’ (from sarx, sark- ‘flesh’ ).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Shanghai Pete</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1523410</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1523410</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:58:33 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;.....uh, ever here of sarcasm? Might be time for a break from China.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BBC1</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1522427</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2008/11/21/what_40_billion_gets_you_these_days.php#comment-1522427</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:36:48 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;&quot;Shockingly, China did not place in the top 10 in either the Environmentalism or Political Freedom categories.&quot;&quot;

How is that shocking? Everyone knows China don&apos;t have clean air or is a democracy. You have to be very naive to think China will crack the 10 in Environmentalism. China&apos;s spending of 40 Billion in the Olympics is peanuts compared to the amount the US is blowing away every month in futile wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>