<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: BBC still getting it wrong after Oasis story correction</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php</link>
<description>All comments for BBC still getting it wrong after Oasis story correction</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shang_newby</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>jakenewby@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>jakenewby@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Dragon32</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604670</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604670</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:23:08 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Can&apos;t be that hard, it&apos;s all copy and paste nowadays anyway!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>gb</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604628</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604628</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:53:25 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Am I reading this correctly? Shanghaiist is starting to take on the BBC for journalistic credibility? Wow.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>taihanasie</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604488</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604488</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:50:37 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What makes you think that newswire reporters have in-depth local knowledge? Just because an article is about China and bears the name of a newswire doesn&apos;t mean the writer is a specialist.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jzzzzzzz</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604459</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604459</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:38:27 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;They have edited the story and added a correction now:

&apos;Correction 4 March 2009: An earlier version of this story wrongly reported that Bjork had shouted &quot;Free Tibet!&quot; during a Shanghai concert in 2008, and that this had gone unreported by the state-controlled Chinese media. &apos;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>rldh</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604381</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604381</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:18:06 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, dammit, if only the BBC gave a few more Shanghaiist writers jobs. Curse those paid so-called &apos;real&apos; reporters, getting their facts wrong about China, not having all that in depth local knowledge we local laowais have. I mean, we would never...hey, look, another cool sandwich delivery shop opened!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>taihanasie</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604373</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1604373</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:59:55 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You are clearly not paying attention or trying to distort the problem. This isn&apos;t a case of lying. It is a case of carelessness. The fact that the BBC removed the bit about Bjork&apos;s utterance being unreported in Chinese media shows that they are not following a &quot;lie about China&quot; agenda.

I long for the day when wire services start to actually promote thoughtful writing instead of cribbed stories.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>BBC1</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1603699</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1603699</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:15:40 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Western media is no different from Chinese media, they will lie if it serves their cause, like demonizing China.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>yan</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1603543</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/03/04/bbc_still_getting_it_wrong_after_oa.php#comment-1603543</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:51:20 +0800</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;According to the Chinese promoters, they had to pull out due to economic issues...
I saw an article about this on Renmin Ri Bao yesterday but couldn&apos;t find it today. I guess it got Big Brothered.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
