<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Shanghaiist: China Telecom&apos;s 3G to be faster than your ADSL at home?</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php</link>
<description>All comments for China Telecom&apos;s 3G to be faster than your ADSL at home?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 shanghailaine</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>elaine@shanghaiist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>elaine@shanghaiist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jamar</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1627052</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1627052</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:01:37 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Note: &quot;Xunlei&quot; is known as &quot;FlashGet&quot; in most of the world. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Shanghai Pete</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1627050</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1627050</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:37:43 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;China Unicom is the carrier for the W-CDMA standard. China Netcom ceased to exist when the Telcos were reorganized last year.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>kfpanda</title>
<link>http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1626704</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://shanghaiist.com/2009/04/01/china_telecoms_3g_to_be_faster_than.php#comment-1626704</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:29:43 +0700</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;kbps is different from KBps because 8 bits = 1 Byte. Thus 266.67KBps is roughly 2133.36 kbps or 2.1 mbps.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
