Quantcast

Factory explodes in Nanjing, killing 10; officials try to censor it

nanjingblast.jpg Yesterday, our neighboring city of Nanjing was rocked by a giant explosion at a plastic factory which killed 10 people and injured over 120. Of those, 14 are critically injured. The force of the blast was so strong that broken glass was strewn along streets as far as 1km away.

According to Xinhua, the explosion was caused by workers damaging a propylene pipeline as they were dismantling factory buildings at the Nanjing No. 4 Plastics Factory. An excavator had hit a pipe of 159mm in diameter. The pipe began spewing gas, which was then lit on fire when a motorist started a car engine at the scene.

Allegedly, this wasn't even the first time a major gas leak happened in the area. Nanfang Daily reports that just one day before, in the exact same district, a fertilizer tank vehicle got stuck under a railway bridge and damaged its sealing lid, causing hundreds of tons of liquefied petroleum gas to spew out over several hundred meters. Police and firemen managed to contain that leak before anyone was seriously hurt.

One near miss and one actual devastating explosion (with possible environmental consequences) in one week? What is with the shoddy protection systems in place for these kind of problems in Nanjing? The Xinhua, article doesn't say much about it, and, if this accidental live broadcast is any indication, they were the only ones allowed at the scene.

From ESWN:

At the scene, the Jiangsu City TV Channel reporter was conducting a live broadcast. An unidentified government leader came over and asked: "What is your name? Give me your telephone. Who gave permission for you to conduct a live broadcast?" The reporter replied: "The Xinhua reporters are here too. Why don't you ask them first?"

Although this reporter identified himself as a Jiangsu TV reporter, it was to no avail as his signal was cut off. However, this particular encounter with the official was show live over Jiangsu City TV.

This video was widely disseminated on the Internet, and that official has been identified. About 30 minutes later, the video began to disappear from the various video websites.

While this is the only big proof that Chinese officials are now making sure only their state-approved report of the blast is disseminated, others in the area have also complained of censorship.

Time will tell whether the knee-jerk reaction is just a typical attempt to control the news in any emergency, or whether there was something here that Nanjing officials were especially careful to hide. At any rate, the chances we'll be able to see anything besides tales of selfless Nanjing residents donating blood from local media is pretty slim.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@shanghaiist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • nanheyangrouchuan

    Two complete idiots. A regular industrial accident turned into a media circus by control freak officials who probably had a hand in the lax practices and lack of any safety training, equipment or fire suppression that led to this accident.

    English teaching jobs must be in short supply.

  • Francois

    I partly agree with El Jefe.

    You should have only comment the censorship. Or if you want to talk about the correlation of the accidents, you should have bring prouf of this.

    I only spent 3 weeks in China and I'm wondering why there is not more accidents like the truck one : China roads are crazy.

    We are speaking about China like if it's a country like our western one. But it's not. They are not yet at the same development level. Lots of place in the country are still at the middle age level. So we can't compare.

    What our media show us from China is only the few megapoles (Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing ...) But in the countryside (where I've been during my solitary trip) they still use swing-plough to work in fields.

    So when we speak about China, we shouldn't compare with our way of life, but just display the gap they still have to complete.

    We have taken 2 centuries to make this changements. And we are asking China to make them in 20 years.

    From my point of view the most important thing we should do for chinese, is to help them to open their eyes/mind and unveil the wrongdoings of their leaders (like we should more often do in our countries).

    I'm dreaming of a world with a sort of media war, where foreign media try to show every shenanigans of our own country leaders.

  • EL JEFE

    How do you end up drawing the conclusion that "shoddy protection systems" are somehow to blame? Because they happened in the same district, they are somehow correlated? From what I can tell, these were independent incidents and the first one was cleaned up without much harm, so the "protection system" was actually quite effective. I don't really know how you would protect from any possible accidents. The first one may have just been a case of the driver ignoring a clearance sign. The second one also seems to be caused by operator error. The censorship is another issue...but no wonder Chinese people get pissed when they read our Western "news."

blog comments powered by Disqus

personals

Enter our FREE personals site!

send a tip

tips@shanghaiist.com

recent comments